Information and cognitive concepts of the intellectual activity processes of a person during decision making in crisis conditions

  1. Home
  2. Archive
  3. № 2 (59)
Author(s) Collection number Pages Download abstract Download full text
Lysa N. K., Navytka L. M., Sabat V. I., Sikora L. S., Tupychak L. L. № 2 (59) 80-89 Image Image

On the basis of the concept of purposeful cognitive agent, the elements of intellectual activity of a person are considered in decision-making and the formation of management actions of organizational and technogenic structures.

At the present stage of integrated systems development of management of industrial and administrative structures the important problem is the detection of rules and mechanisms, decision-making procedures, based on which it is possible to identify information signs, the structure between objects, their whole orientation. This would allow to correctly predict the dynamics of events and to choose a strategy of counteraction in the conditions of crisis situations, as well as to form a model of behaviour based on the obtained new knowledge.

The use of systematic analysis of information interaction researches of the experiment environment and cognitive neural systems allows to identify the tasks which are the basis of intellectual activity of a person, which creates conditions for disclosing the structure of algorithms based on logic-mathematical models proving by the theorems of the inductive and deductive output, the structuring of data which is the basis of the decisions formation.

Based on these provisions, the concept on the need to disclose the role of the neural structures of the brain in the shaping and decision-making system within the cognitive concept of a focused cognitive neuro-processor is important as an intelligent system for the information processing. In the dialogue mode, the formation and interaction of signals, the implementation of rules and algorithms is performed. The interaction of substructures, based on inductive and deduction procedures, generating hypotheses in the neural ensembles, the formation of action strategies to achieve the goal takes place in the cognitive “I-system” of the person (RVP).

Keywords: structure, system, information, intellect, agent, management, solution, integration, control.

doi: 10.32403/1998-6912-2019-2-59-80-89


  • 1. Napalkov, A. V., & Pragina, L. L. (1985). Mozg cheloveka i iskusstvennyi intellekt. Moskva (in Russian).
  • 2. Sikora, L. S. (1998). Systemolohiia pryiniattia rishen v skladnykh tekhnolohichnykh sys­te­makh. Lviv : Kameniar (in Ukrainian).
  • 3. Fiziologiia povedeniia: Neirobiologicheskie zakonomernosti / pod red. Butueva A. S. (1987). Leningrad : Nauka (in Russian).
  • 4. Sistemnye mekhanizmy povedeniia / pod red. Sudakova K. V. (1990). Moskva : Meditcina (in Russian).
  • 5. Khomskaia, E. D. (2005). Neiropsikhologiia. Sankt-Peterburg : Piter (in Russian).
  • 6. Luriia, A. R. (2002). Osnovy neiropsikhologii. Moskva : ASADEMIA (in Russian).
  • 7. Funktcionalnye sistemy organizma / pod red. Sudakova K. V. (1987). Moskva : Meditcina (in Russian).
  • 8. Dordzh, F. (1963). Mozg kak vychislitelnaia mashina. Moskva : Mir (in Russian).
  • 9. Psikhologiia ekstremalnykh situatcii / pod red. Taras A. E. (2002). Moskva : AST (in Russian).
  • 10. Shirochin, V. P. (2004). Arkhitektonika myshleniia i neirointelekt. Kiev : Iunior (in Russian).
  • 11. Petrov, E. T. (2004). metody i zasoby pryiniattia rishen u sotsialno-ekonomichnykh systemakh. Kyiv : Tekhnika (in Ukrainian).
  • 12. Koromchuk, M. S., & Kryiton, V. M. (2009). Sotsialno psykholohichne zabezpechennia diialnosti v zvychainykh i ekstremalnykh umovakh. Kyiv : Nika-Tsentr (in Ukrainian).
  • 13. Durniak, B. V., Sikora, L. S., Antonyk, M. S., & Tkachuk, R. L. (2013). Avtomatyzovani liu­dyno–mashynni systemy upravlinnia intehrovanymy iierarkhichnymy orhanizatsiinymy ta vyrobnychymy strukturamy v umovakh ryzyku i konfliktiv. Lviv : Ukrainska akademiia drukarstva (in Ukrainian).
  • 14. Durniak, B. V., Sikora, L. S., Lysa, N. K., Tkachuk, R. L., & Yavorskyi, B. I. (2017). In­for­matsiini ta lazerni tekhnolohii vidboru potokiv danykh ta yikh kohnityvna interpretatsiia v avtomatyzovanykh systemakh upravlinnia. Lviv : Ukrainska akademiia drukarstva (in Ukrai­nian).
  • 15. Durniak, B. V., Sikora, L. S., Antonyk, M. S, & Tkachuk, R. L. (2013). Kohnityvni modeli formuvannia stratehii operatyvnoho upravlinnia intehrovanymy iierarkhichnymy strukturamy v umovakh ryzykiv i konfliktiv. Lviv : Ukrainska akademiia drukarstva (in Ukrainian).
  • 16. Sikora, L. S. (2009). Kohnityvni modeli ta lohika operatyvnoho upravlinnia v iierarkhichnykh intehrovanykh systemakh v umovakh ryzyku. Lviv : TsSD (in Ukrainian).
  • 17. Emelianov, E. F. (1988). Tekhnologiia sistemnogo modelirovaniia. Moskva : Mashinostroenie (in Russian).
  • 18. Tkachuk, R. L., & Sikora, L. S. (2010). Lohiko-kohnityvni modeli formuvannia upravlinskykh rishen intehrovanymy systemamy v ekstremalnykh umovakh. Lviv : Liha-Pres (in Ukrainian).
  • 19. O’Konor, Dzhozef, & Makdermontt, Iien. (2018). Systemne myslennia: poshuk neordynarnykh tvorchykh rishen. Kyiv : Nash format (in Ukrainian).
  • 20. Kozelnitckii, Iu. (1979). Psikhologicheskaia teoriia reshenii. Moskva : Progress (in Russian).
  • 21. Atkinson, R. (1980). Chelovecheskaia pamiat i protcess obucheniia. Moskva : Progres (in Rus­sian).
  • 22. Bruner, Dzh. (1971). Psikhologiia poznaniia. Moskva : Progress (in Russian).
  • 23. Psikhologiia myshleniia / red. Matiushkina A. M. (1965). Moskva : Progress (in Russian).